UCSB Science Line
Sponge Spicules Nerve Cells Galaxy Abalone Shell Nickel Succinate X-ray Lens Lupine
UCSB Science Line
How it Works
Ask a Question
Search Topics
Our Scientists
Science Links
Contact Information
I have heard several contradictory statements regarding the impact of wildfires on the environment, especially in our local Southern California Chaparral biome and Mediterranean climate. Overall, do wildfires cause detriment to the environment or do they act as a natural fertilizer and allow for biodiversity?
Answer 1:

This is a good question and a complex topic. I'll refer to a wildfire as a fire which causes or conditions were not affected by humans.

Wildfires are devastating events - they destroy big areas, remove/damage vegetation, threat animals and change physical conditions in the fire region. However, on a bigger scale wildfires are part of the natural cycles - they play role in big scale vegetation succession, age structure, nutrients balance etc. So, natural or 'wild' fires are necessary part of a health ecosystem and thus they do support biodiversity.

The problem here is that there are not much 'wild' fires left. Humans are the #1 cause of the fire nowadays. In some regions this increases the frequency of fires and this often has a harmful effect on the natural cycles. (e.g. instead of 10 ha of forest being burned in a time period in a n area, 500 now will be burn) From the other hand, in many regions with high development density wild fires are 'under control'. Historically we as humans try to 'protect' our property and the land from fires. So in some regions preventive measures succeed in making fires a rarer event. This is true for CA. As it turns out, rarer does not mean better. As there is now longer time periods between fires - more dry wood is accumulated in the ecosystem as a fuel. So when the fire finally starts - we have much more severe and larger scale event. E.g. instead of 10 small fires few ha each, we now have a huge one, burning hundreds ha with higher temperature. Big scale and high temperature fires have a bigger impact on the biomes and they may affect the natural capacity of the biome to self-restore after the fire.

The most frontier land/conservation management strategies today include fires as a normal component. However, we basically don't know how much fire is good for the particular ecosystem and thus the 'adaptive management' strategy is used. A fire regime is introduced to the system with known parameters area, temperature, frequency. Than managers monitor how the system behaves and adapt fire strategies when necessary.

In summary, wildfires are indeed a part of natural cycles. Due to human activity, patterns of natural fires, their frequency, their scale and their chemistry change. These changes may have a harmful effect on the ecosystem. We are still in process of understanding the complex mechanism of fire regimes effects on ecosystems.

Answer 2:

It's true that wildfire is very important to the natural environment.There are some types of plants that can only reproduce in the presence of wildfire (e.g. I believe the pine cones of sequoias and some other types of trees can only be opened by fire). Other plants are able to better compete for resources (water and sunlight) if other plants are cleared by wildfire. And, like you mentioned, wildfire can help produce fertilizers that can help some plants grow. The reality is that we're now seeing a lot more wildfires where urban and wildland areas meet. One reason for the increase in fires are that people are setting more fires (whether by accident or on purpose) than just the naturally-caused fires (such as those ignited by lightening). There is also more dry dead wood to be burned at the urban interface than in the forest. That concept might seem counterintuitive, but what are houses made of? Dry, dead wood! Houses can burn even more easily than forests. So yes, wildfires are important in the natural environment. They do produce natural fertilizers and allow for biodiversity. They are also devastating when they occur in urban areas, where fires can burn homes and cause flooding by burning plants that would otherwise use precipitation and leaving a waxy hydrophobic (water-hating) layer of burned plant material on the surface.

I cannot give you the direct answer you want because wildfires are incredibly important in the natural environment but measures need to be taken to decrease wildfires in urban areas. To make it even more confusing, one method firefighters use to combat wildfires in urban areas is to set backfires or controlled burns that burn through dry brush.

Click Here to return to the search form.

University of California, Santa Barbara Materials Research Laboratory National Science Foundation
This program is co-sponsored by the National Science Foundation and UCSB School-University Partnerships
Copyright © 2015 The Regents of the University of California,
All Rights Reserved.
UCSB Terms of Use