|
On land all plants appear green, where as aquatic
plants vary in color. Why do land plants have one
photosynthetic strategy where aquatic plants use
different light harvesting strategies?
|
Question Date: 2009-10-22 | | Answer 1:
I had never thought about this before, but
perhaps it's due to how light is influenced by
water. Light passes through air pretty freely,
but gets absorbed and refracted a lot more in
water. As you know, green plants are absorbing
pretty much all the non-green wavelengths of
light.Maybe other pigments are more effective at
absorbing other wavelengths.If that's true, I'd
expect the colors of plants to vary predictably
with depth, water clarity, etc. It could
also be due to the availability of raw materials
present to make the pigments, I guess. My
third hypothesis is that it doesn't have anything
to do with the water itself, but that some of
those aquatic plants are on an evolutionary branch
that uses different pigments, so that it's sort of
an accident of history. Not being a botanist, I
don't know if this is true. So you gave me a
good question, but I don't have a particularly
good answer for you, just more
questions. Thanks for asking, | | Answer 2:
As far as I've understood, you are totally
correct.Water absorbs a lot of the red light, so
only blue and green light are able to reach the
plants deep underwater. Therefore, plants had to
evolve a different strategy for collecting the
most energy out of the light spectrum that they
are given. Their photoreceptors are more
sensitive to the blue side of the spectrum, and
the red light is often reflected, which is why a
lot of underwater plants are reddish looking.
Many different colors can be found in different
plants, typically dependent on the quality and
spectrum of light that they receive. Great
question! | | Answer 3:
Great observation. Light penetration in water
(usually ocean water although this also applies to
fresh water) alters which color wavelengths occur
at different depths. Within the first 30 feet
reds, oranges, yellows and purples fall off of the
available spectrum leaving blues and greens
penetrating into the deeper waters. Since green
plants use reds and oranges for photosynthesis,
green plants can no longer function at any depth
greater than 10 feet. Therefore for a plant to
undergo photosynthesis it must be of a color that
absorbs blues or green. The complement color to
green is red and for blue is orange, so that is
why brown and red algae is found at depth and
green algae is found at the ocean surface or in
tide pools. As for the why, that is a lesson
in evolution. Many times several organisms enter
the same area or niche, each with a different
strategy for survival.The organism either survives
(thus their strategy works) or doesn't. Those
that survive continue to live and reproduce until
the conditions change. At that time, the organism
again either has or doesn't have the strategies to
survive. For each change in environment (short
term or over millions of years) an organism
survives only because of pre-existing abilities.
An example: if the climate changed tomorrow to
being below freezing everywhere, only those people
already owning down jackets, insulated jackets and
snow boots would survive. If you have any
further questions, specifically about plants or
evolution don't hesitate in asking. I love
answering these types of questions. | | Answer 4:
Good question! There are three major
lineages of multicellular photosynthetic
organisms, the green algae, the red algae, and the
brown algae. These three types have their
unicellular equivalents as well. Each of these
have different pigments they use for
photosynthesis, which give them their respective
colors. Land plants evolved from the green algae,
which is the immediate reason why land plants are
green. So why is it that only the green
algae were able to successfully invade the land?
There are several possibilities, one of them being
simply that the greens got there first and were
already adapted to the land environment before the
browns or reds got the chance. It's also possible
that the green pigments are better at getting
energy at high light levels such as happen on
land, as opposed to the lower (and more heavily
composed of blue light) light levels that exist a
few meters below the surface of the ocean, which
may give the greens a competitive edge. A third
possibility is that the green algae live primarily
in fresh water, and it may be that evolving from
fresh water to life on land may be physiologically
easier than going directly from the ocean to land
(note that fish evolved in fresh water, so
vertebrate life on land came from fresh water as
well - although I'm not sure the same is true of
insects, who may have come straight from the
ocean). There is a fossil that lived
between about 440 million years ago to maybe 350
million years ago that was a large, tree-sized
organism, may even have been the first "tree", and
some people have thought it might have been a
brown alga. Recent work however has indicated that
this bizarre fossil was more likely a kind of
"woody" fungus related to mushrooms and not an
attempt by a non-green alga to colonize the land
but failed. Click Here to return to the search form.
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2020 The Regents of the University of California,
All Rights Reserved.
UCSB Terms of Use
|
|
|