|
I understand that scientists first check out how
old the bones are to make sure they found some
old ones but how do they know what kind of animal
it was, when they find only some bones?
|
Question Date: 2003-09-26 | | Answer 1:
Many bones possess distinctive characteristics
related to function. Some of these
characteristics reflect where certain muscles
attached, creating scars. Others reflect fusions of
old bones from deep within the evolutionary
history of the clade (a group of organisms
believed to have evolved from a common ancestor,
according to the principles of cladistics).
It is true that many of the
post-cranial bones (those of the skeleton behind
the skull) often lack good characters - The long
bones of the legs in particular are often not too
distinctive. Some aspects of bone cell structure
allow you to distinguish fish from reptile from
mammal. However, certain bones are very
distinctive, particularly those associated with
the skull, teeth, and to a lesser degree, the
pelvis. Much of this takes a trained eye to spot,
and one of the things a vertebrate paleontologist
must do is spend months as a student learning how
to identify bone scraps. | | Answer 2:
That is a tough question if a scientist finds a
bone that looks like nothing, like anything they
have ever seen. It is like putting a puzzle
together without having the final picture to work
with. As you find a single bone, you look for
others like it and hope that more bones are
found.
For example, one leg bone may be found
all by itself in China, but a similar leg bone may
be found in Canada but with more of the skeleton
with it. You can then infer that the one leg bone
from China is the same animal and estimate the
size and shape from that. | | Answer 3:
Identifying an animal from just a few bones can
range anywhere from very easy to impossible.
For each animal, there are certain bones that you
could use to identify it in minutes, and certain
bones that will never be able to give you a
positive identification. Teeth are among the
best bones to find,since they provide a lot of
information, such as diet, size, and often are
unique enough to be able to identify a species
from just one tooth. Skulls in general are
unique enough when studied in great detail so that
we can compare a new skull to tons of old skulls
preserved in museums to figure out what we have.
We also can use museum collections to
identify other bones, but this is often difficult
to do without teeth or a skull. Sometimes
clues like the other bones found in a site, the
age of the rocks around the fossils, and the
geographic location can help us narrow down the
possibilities. From most bones, we can guess a
lot about an animal, but can't necessarily say
EXACTLY what it is--for example, maybe we could
say it was a porcupine, but we couldn't say
precisely which type of porcupine. | | Answer 4:
First, it's important to remember that scientists
can only theorize about the animals who left the
fossilized bones, since nobody has actually seen
these animals. Some of these theories end up being
disprove, but most of the theories are almost
certainly true.
There are a couple of
reasons why I say that. The first is that all
theories and findings made by scientists that are
published in scientific journals(which is how
everyone else gets to hear about them) have to
undergo a process called "peer review".
This is
where other, objective scientists go over the
theories and findings before they're published to
be sure that they're accurate and sensible. So
everything that's published in a scientific
journal has been double- and triple-checked by a
number of other scientists.
The other
reason why most theories about dinosaur bones are
probably true is that the people who make those
theories know an awful lot about bone structure,
about which bones do what, about what kinds of
features identify a bone as coming from this or
that kind of animal, and about how big or small
bones need to be to perform different tasks. For
example, certain features of a bone can tell them
what kind of animal it came from (bird bones are
hollow, for instance), and what body part. So now
they know ,maybe, that a certain bone was from a
bird-like animal whose arm (or wing)was 6 feet
long. The thickness of the bone can give them a
good guess of how much weight it needed to move
around and, therefore, how much this animal
probably weighed. They can identify the part of
the bone that attached to muscle, and this can
tell them how much the animal moved the limb and
with how much force. That might give them a big
clue about whether or not the limb was a wing used
for flight, or a little-used front limb like those
on T. Rex.
There are many other details
scientists examine about the bones that can give them
surprising amounts of information about the
animal. Plus, scientists might find fossilized
impressions in mud that can show them feathers,
fins, and all kinds of other soft
tissues.
I hope that answers your question!
Remember that science is all about making good
theories, since very few things can be proven
beyond all doubt. The theories you hear about
dinosaurs, though, are probably quite
reliable. Keep asking such great questions! | | Answer 5:
Do you really like cars, or a certain style of
music, or something else? You might be able
to identify particular cars, songs, or other
things apart without any trouble. To someone who
is not a fan, each one is just another car, or
another (country/salsa/rap) song. We pay
attention to the details of what interests us.
My
dad can look briefly at a car and say "57 Chevy
Bel-Aire" or "42 Ford." If you found the skull of
a mammal and showed it to me, I could probably
tell you what it is without any trouble. That's
because I think skulls are very cool, so I study
them and learn about them. Skulls tell a whole
story about an animal; where it lived, what it
ate, how old it was, and more. So to a
scientist,
they're not just "some bones."
If you are
interested in questions like this, you might want
to look into a field called "forensic
anthropology". These scientists learn all about
crimes by looking at skeletons. | | Answer 6:
Just as different living animals look distinct
from the outside (you'd never confuse a dog for a
cat, or a starfish for a lobster), the parts of
those animals that become fossilized (bones,
teeth, and such) can be equally distinctive. It is
as easy to tell horse teeth, cow teeth, and turtle
hips apart, as it is living and breathing cows,
horses, and turtles.
| | Answer 7:
Different animals have different skeletons. There
are attributes of a skeleton that define a group
of animals, and if we find the remains of an
extinct animal, we can figure out what group(s) it
is in by comparing the shape and nature of its
bones to living animals. Sometimes, of course, we
discover that it is not a member of a group living
today - it is a member of a group of which all are
extinct. Click Here to return to the search form.
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2020 The Regents of the University of California,
All Rights Reserved.
UCSB Terms of Use
|
|
|