|
In the future, how do you think we will "protect"
ourselves from global warming?
|
Question Date: 2014-02-24 | | Answer 1:
This is an excellent question! Global warming
is occurring at a very fast rate; the average
surface temperature of the earth has been
increasing at a speed of about 2˚ Celsius per
century for the past 30 or 40 years (Hansen et
al., 2006). This may not seem like a lot, but it
could have a huge impact on human civilizations.
Human activity releases greenhouse gases, such as
carbon dioxide and methane, that cause energy from
the sun to be trapped in the atmosphere instead of
reflecting back into space, and most scientists
think that greenhouse gases are the leading cause
of the global warming trend that is currently
happening. An obvious way to protect ourselves
from global warming then is to decrease the amount
of greenhouse gases that we are putting into our
atmosphere. Much of the greenhouse gas that goes
into the atmosphere comes from fossil fuels like
gas, oil, and coal that we burn to power our cars
and airplanes, heat our homes, and generate
electricity (we use fossils fuels for many other
things as well). We can slow down how fast we put
these gases into the atmosphere by using other
sources of energy such as solar and wind power,
that are known as clean energy sources. We have
been starting to use solar and wind technologies
more and more over the last few decades
(California actually has the largest solar power
system in the world), but we still rely on burning
fossil fuels. We need to make an even greater
effort at decreasing the rate of fossil fuel
emissions to have the needed effect.
A more active approach for slowing down the
buildup of greenhouse gases (especially carbon
dioxide) in our atmosphere is to trap them in some
sort of long-term storage. One possibility is to
trap carbon dioxide in rocks. There are certain
types of rock, particularly rocks that make up the
ocean crust and upper mantle of the earth, that
can react with carbon dioxide to form minerals
such as calcite and magnesite (Matter & Kellemen,
2009). These minerals can act as long-term
storehouses of carbon dioxide and keep it out of
the atmosphere.
Global warming is already happening, and has
been happening at a very fast rate for several
decades. It is important to try to figure out ways
to slow it down, but it's also important to learn
to deal with its effects. A large proportion of
people on earth live near the coast in areas that
may be effected by sea-level rise and more intense
storms. It's important to prepare cities near the
coast for changes that will happen due to global
warming. This might mean moving people away from
the lowest parts of the cities that will be under
water when sea level rises. It is important to
predict (make educated guesses about) what will
happen to civilizations in different parts of the
world as the temperature continues to increase. We
can then use these predictions to take actions to
protect the people and the property in areas that
might be most strongly effected.
References
Hansen, J., Sato, M., Ruedy, R., Lo, K., Lea, D.
W., & Medina-Elizade, M. (2006). Global
temperature change. Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences, 103(39), 14288-14293.
Matter, J. M., & Kelemen, P. B. (2009). Permanent
storage of carbon dioxide in geological reservoirs
by mineral carbonation. Nature Geoscience, 2(12),
837-841.
| | Answer 2:
Short answer:
I think we will "protect" ourselves from global
warming through a combination of (1) decreasing
our CO2 emissions (through increased energy
efficiency, carbon capture and storage, and
eventually shifting to alternative energy
sources), (2) removing some of the excess
CO2 that
we have already put into the atmosphere with
technology like "artificial trees," and (3)
adapting to the consequences of global warming.
Long answer:
The best way we can protect ourselves from global
warming is by taking actions now to reduce the
amount of CO2 we are putting into the
atmosphere. If we do not take strong actions, we
will have to deal with the consequences of a 2-4°C
increase in the global mean temperature by the end
of the 21st century. These consequences include
sea level rising 1-3 feet, increased hurricane
intensity, an increase in droughts in many areas,
and increased flooding in other areas. To some
extent, we will probably have "protect" ourselves
from these consequences by adapting to them, for
example building desalination plants to deal with
shortages of drinking water or building dikes to
protect against rising sea level. Of course, it
will be more difficult for developing nations that
may lack the resources to adapt, and it will
likely be devastating for many ecosystems.
So, the better protection is to prevent the
warming in the first place. Three ways we can do
this are (1) put less CO2 into the
atmosphere, (2) remove CO2 from the
atmosphere, (3) offset the effects of greenhouse
gases by decreasing the amount of solar radiation
absorbed by the Earth. In my opinion, #1 is the
best option. It can be achieved through developing
alternative energy sources other than fossil
fuels, increasing energy efficiency (e.g.
insulating homes better), and by capturing
CO2 from large point sources such as
power plants before it is released into the
atmosphere. I think that in the future, we will
also use CO2 removal from the
atmosphere to prevent further warming. There are
various ways that we could remove CO2
from the atmosphere, from things as simple as
planting trees to large-scale engineering
projects. A relatively safe engineering solution
is "artificial trees" that remove CO2
directly from the atmosphere by chemical
reactions. Another idea is to fertilize the ocean
with iron to increase the growth of phytoplankton
that consume CO2. However, this
approach is more risky because of unknown
side-effects to the ocean ecosystem.
Geoenginering projects that seek to reduce the
amount of solar energy absorbed by the Earth are
the riskiest of all, and therefore in my opinion,
least likely to be used to protect us from global
warming. These projects involve reflecting
sunlight away from the Earth, and range from using
pale-colored roofing and paving (white reflects
radiation, black absorbs it), to reflective
aerosol particles to the atmosphere, to put
mirrors in space to reflect away some of the sun's
energy. These projects would reduce the average
temperature, but they would not do anything for
other problems caused by high CO2
levels, such as ocean acidification, and we don't
really know what all the side effects would be.
Click Here to return to the search form.
|
|
|
|
|
Copyright © 2020 The Regents of the University of California,
All Rights Reserved.
UCSB Terms of Use
|
|
|