Answer 1:
Well it depends somewhat on how one defines the
term Human. A paleoanthropologist would say that
the first true human goes by the name Homo
sapiens. This gives the genus, the species and
the variety, words that have very specific
meanings in biology and evolutionary theory.
According to genetic and fossil evidence, archaic
homo sapiens sapiens evolved to anatomically
modern humans in Africa
roughly 200,000 to 100,000 years ago. Members
of one branch, perhaps driven by the quest for
new environments and resources?, left
Africa by 60,000 years ago and over time replacing
earlier human populations such as Neanderthals and
Homo erectus .
Before this time, paleontologists can trace the
origins of the genus Homo back for 2 or three
million years based on fossils and sophisticated
work that can be done with fossil material. But
these primates looked considerably different than
modern man (Homo sapiens sapiens).
As an example of the nomenclature, consider the
Neanderthals. Where do they fit in in
detail? For
some time, paleoanthropologists have debated
whether Neanderthals should be classified as Homo
neanderthalensis or Homo sapiens
neanderthalensis,
the latter placing Neanderthals as a
subspecies of H.
sapiens. Some morphological studies support the
view that H. neanderthalensis is a separate
species and
not a subspecies. Others, say "no evidence has
been found of cultural interaction” and evidence
from
mitochondrial DNA
studies has been interpreted as evidence
Neanderthals
were not a subspecies of H. sapiens. This sort of
disagreement between experts is part of the
refining process of science in general. There is
always a quest for more information and new
studies. For example, discovery of new hominid
fossils can change the present ‘best guess”.
The
good news is that science operates by successive
approximation and when things go well each new
piece of information makes our understanding more
complete.
|