Answer 1:
Museums generally keep moon rocks under vacuum.
Let’s consider the difference in atmospheric
pressure on the earth (760 torr) and the moon
(10-12 torr). The pressure on the moon is actually
close to the lowest we can generate on Earth, and
it’s closer to the vacuum of outer space (10-17
torr) than our pressure. If you open the chamber,
air would rush in quickly and press on the rock
surface. Thankfully, it wouldn’t implode
because rocks (including ones from the moon) can’t
be compressed under pressure. This means they
don’t change volume when exposed to high or low
pressures, the way gases do. (Liquids are hardly
compressible either.)
The rock could be broken with
enough applied force (like if we focused that
blast of air on just a small section) but if we
expose the whole moon rock to air and do it
slowly, the rock won’t break. Generally,
explosions or implosions only occur when the
volume of a gas changes (due to change in pressure
or temperature) inside a container than can be
deformed under the force. Since the rock
itself can’t be deformed, even gas pockets inside
the rock (which are unlikely) wouldn’t feel change
in pressure.
So, if it’s not to keep the moon
rock together, why keep it under vacuum?
It’s to keep water, dust and microbes from
Earth out. Studying moon rocks gives us
insight into how the solar system and the Earth
were made, and they were very difficult to obtain.
Even the rocks you see in the museum are still
being studied and tested to learn even more. By
sucking out all the air in the chamber, we also
reduce the risk of contamination, so that the rock
you see is exactly the same as when it was taken
off the moon.
|
Answer 2:
As we think about this scenario, let's imagine
what happens in each step of the process.
We should first notice this; if the rock was
found at the moon, we would have to put this moon
rock into a vacuum chamber before transporting it.
This would result in a rapid decrease in pressure,
going from moon pressure to 0 pressure.
Next we look at the ideal gas law (pressure and
volume are proportional to the number of moles and
the temperature). When all other parameters were
held constant, the pressure change must result in
some opposing volume change. If you think of this
with a marshmallow, when it is at atmospheric
pressure the marshmallow is fluffy and light. If
you drop the pressure putting the same marshmallow
in a vacuum, you'll see it increase in size. If it
were a perfect vacuum, the 'mallow would take up
the whole space of the container!
Now, let's take the rock in this case. Since the
moon rock is going to be a very dense solid, we
can't impose the same logic of the marshmallow's
volume increase. The rock has strong molecular
forces between molecules within the solid, and
does not change much when exposed to this change
in pressure.
Finally, we have our moon rock and we bring it
back to Earth. Now we are at normal atmospheric
pressure, which is relatively high. We take our
moon rock out of vacuum, where its pressure
increases drastically. Since pressure is caused
by force over an area, the pressure does
affect the rock. Appropriate force is applied to
the rock from all sides when the pressure is very
great. However, (again) due to inter-molecular
forces in the solid, the pressure change would not
make any observable difference. In cases in
which the pressure is infinitely big, there is a
good chance the rock experiences an
implosion when taken out of vacuum, as it
exceeds these forces within the rock.
In the same process, there is a way to turn the
rock from a solid to a liquid and/or gas solely by
changing the pressure. If at the right
temperatures with the right materials,
(CO2 is seen to do this) one could drop
the pressure low enough to change the phase of the
"moon rock" into either a liquid or gas. The
material then loses it's strong inter-molecular
forces and is free to follow the imposed change in
volume, as seen by the ideal gas law. In putting
it in a vacuum, the pressure change could
transform this rock into a liquid or gas, however,
assuming the moon rock is made of some mixture of
earthly metals (like silicon, iron and magnesium),
this most likely will not occur.
In this case, if we take the liquid/gas
material in the vacuum chamber and slowly increase
the pressure to atmospheric, we can see the object
condense into a similar, solid material seen on
the moon.
I hope this answers your question!
|
Answer 3:
Neither. If the moon rock is really a rock,
then it is just as solid as a rock on Earth would
be (and, specifically, a kind of lava called
basalt, which most of the moon's surface is made
out of). Much of the rock on the moon formed from
molten lava, something which is impossible without
pressure to keep it from boiling. This suggests
that the moon might have had an atmosphere at one
point!
|