Answer 1:
Many people think that scientists find out the
truth and tell people all about the truth. Some
people even think that Science can answer
everything there is to know about life, death, the
universe and so on. Well, in my opinion, Science
cannot tell you everything there is to know.
For example, someone once asked me if there
was a scientific explanation for why people love
pets. Well, I told him that maybe there is
chemical that pets release that we are attracted
to, or maybe pets make us feel safe and so our
stress hormones are lower. But I also told him
that those are only scientific explanations. That
is, they are the explanations that Science can
examine and measure. If I want to see if pets
release a chemical that attracts people, I would
try to make this chemical in the lab and see if
reminds people of their pets. Or if I wanted to
see if pets lower our stress hormone levels, I
would measure the hormones in people with and
without their pets. You see, Science is a way
of thinking about the universe that is based on
our observation and measurement. If we cannot
measure it, than we cannot use science to examine
it.
How do you measure love? Or how do you
measure anger? If your friend baked a cake for
you, you can probably tell how much flour she used
by weighing the cake and doing some tests.
However, if your friend gets mad at you because
you shared a secret, can you measure how mad she
is at you? Is she 2 cups mad? Is she 1 gallon mad?
No, you can't. Science cannot provide answers to
things that cannot be measured.
It's also
important to remember that Science is conducted by
scientists. Like all people, there are good and
bad scientists. Nice and mean scientists. Some
science has done wonders for the world and for
people. For example, penicillin has kept a
lot of
animals and people from dying of diseases. Some
science, however, is both good and bad. Nuclear
power provides a lot of electricity to light
homes, but it leads to radioactive waste. Is this
good or bad? Is it both? You see, Science can
be very good and very fun, but it is up to each
person to make it good and fun.
Finally, I
don't think that life sciences are any easier or
harder than physical sciences. Some of my friends
are very good at math and love physical science.
They are going to be famous physicists some day,
but they cannot understand how to study starfish
in the ocean. Some biologists do not understand
Physics. Like everything else some people are
good at some things and other people are good at
other things. What do you like to do?
|
Answer 2:
Science has improved our lives in so many ways it
is impossible to list them all. Here are a
couple broad examples:
People used to die in
great numbers from some diseases that today are
considered minor annoyances or have been
eliminated outright through the efforts of
scientists. Many cancers that used to be a death
sentence 20-30 years ago are now very treatable
and, in many cases, can be cured. People today
live longer and are probably much healthier than
in the past and much of the reason for that is the
great strides that have been made in medical
science and technology. There are new drugs and
diagnostic and surgical techniques coming out all
the time.
Most of the mechanical and electronic
technology that we use to today (such as cell
phones, CD players, computers, and refrigerators
for example) were in part made possible by past
scientific investigations. I think most people
believe that these items are an improvement.
Sometimes, it seems almost impossible to live
without some items that have become available due
to recent scientific advances. Science can
also come up with some things that aren't so good.
Weapons of all varieties have also gotten better
due, in part, to Science. I believe that there
is no one type of science that is "better" than
another. You should get involved in the field that
you get most excited about. Once you find what you
are interested in, you might find that it is also
the one that is easiest for you to learn. Some
people prefer biology, others chemistry or
physics. If you eventually get involved in
research, you will probably further specialize
within your chosen field on a very specific topic. |
Answer 3:
Science has improved our lives greatly- it has
done far more good than most people realize. 1000
years ago, most people had to toil nonstop from
sunrise to sunset just to raise enough crops to
escape starvation. The life expectancy was about
25 years, assuming one survived the early
childhood diseases which killed more than half of
small children. Without effective medicines, a
sore throat or minor injury could be the beginning
of a slow and miserable death. Without science,
life was nasty, brutish, and short. Life science
was most directly responsible for improving our
lives, because most infectious diseases are now
mere inconveniences. Most of us live to old age,
which is three times longer than could be expected
without modern medicine. Also, in medieval times
most people worked 80-hour weeks as farmers, just
to survive. Now only a few percent of the
population can grow enough food for the rest of
us. Life science has contributed to this through
selective breeding, genetic engineering, and pest
control. Engineering science has also greatly
improved our lives, by transferring menial work to
machines- in fact, this probably did more than
life science in removing the farming burden.
Machines also allow us to have large, sturdy
houses, plenty of warm clothes, easy travel, many
useful tools, etc. Back when everything had to be
made by hand, everything was very expensive and
most of our items today were simply impossible to
make, so people just had to do without. People
also spent most of their waking hours working-
there was almost no free time. We take so many
things for granted today. Consider books: When
they had to be copied by hand, they were rare and
precious, and it was much more difficult to learn
things. Physical science has had less direct
influence on our lives, but enormous indirect
influence. Physics is the study of nature's
underlying mathematical laws, and as such, it is
the fundamental science on which all others
ultimately depend. Advancing in life science,
engineering, chemistry, etc. would be a very slow,
often trial-and-error process without the
understanding that comes from physics. Take life
science, for example: The microscope was invented
because we understood the physics of light, the
MRI body-scanner was invented because we
understood the magnetic behavior of atomic nuclei,
and the PCR DNA-amplification technique was
invented because we understood thermodynamics.
Most biologists today rely heavily on chemistry,
and most of our chemistry knowledge comes from
understanding the physics of atoms. Also, since
all laws of nature are interconnected, physics
tends to take us in unexpected directions which
lead to something extremely useful.
Electricity was discovered by a few physicists
tinkering around in their basements, trying to
understand magnets. At first, electricity was an
academic curiosity with no for seeable use, but
now it is hard to imagine a world without
it. Basically, if you want immediate benefits
for humanity, do life science. For long-term
benefits, physical science is best because it
illuminates the way to many other, more directly
useful discoveries. Physics is somewhat harder to
learn than life science, because it requires a
broad understanding of natural phenomena. They're
all connected, so you must know the basics about
magnetism, light, heat, quantum mechanics, atoms,
sound, gravity, electricity, astronomy, etc. There
is also a lot of math and logical thinking,
because all phenomena are ultimately controlled by
equations (the "laws of nature"). Life science
requires more memorization, less math, less
difficult thinking, and much fiddling with
equipment. It is easier to specialize, i.e. one
can make useful discoveries about the brain
without needing to know anything about rain forest
ecology. A recent trend is for people to start in
physical science but later switch to life science.
These people often find that their physical
science training helped them develop more rigorous
and creative ways of thinking. Their life science
discoveries come quickly, and have the added
benefit of being immediately useful. As for
the drawbacks of science, it is important to
remember that science is basically a wonderful
multipurpose tool, like a Leatherman. It is not
inherently good or evil, but it can do many
things. 99.9% of the time, the Leatherman is used
for constructive and creative purposes- but it can
also be used as a weapon, and it can cut you if
you're not careful. These are problems of human
stupidity; they don't make the Leatherman "bad".
The Leatherman has many uses, but it is our
responsibility to use it wisely and
carefully. As our knowledge advances, science
becomes increasingly powerful. This is generally a
good thing, because like other tools, science is
mostly used for good purposes. The problem is that
science is now powerful enough to d Click Here to return to the search form.
|